In response to a recent discussion regarding the kidnapping of the 15 British sailors and marines I wrote on "blogsforbush.com":
Face it folks, this is just another mideast ploy to vie for the attention of their peers.."see? I poked a stick at the west too! See? I'm a big boy too!!"
They are testing the waters. This had nothing to do with espionage or military action.
With the libs so divisive and overtly and aggressively attacking all things conservative in their pathetic power struggle, what have the Iranians got to lose?
Of course, this all comes at a price. The question is; do the libs and Iranians really want to pay?
We'll find that out as soon as they realize just how steep the price is. As for us conservatives, we have no choice. Our understanding is painful enough to bear, but if we leave the world to the fruitcakes we'll be only praying to whomever they allow us.
I wonder why the libs don't understand that all the special interest tolerance that they love so much won't be adhered to by our common enemies.
Oh, and let's not forget that the unrest in the middle east has gone on for a lot longer than the republican party's existance, so to say it is due to our foreign policy is ludicrous at best..an outright lie otherwise.
Wednesday, March 28, 2007
Sunday, March 25, 2007
subversive liberalism
Honesty in politics is, at once, rare and absolutely vital to the proper execution of political tasks or those of diplomatic or military functions.
However, with those uninitiated within the mass population of our country tending to absorb slogans and persistantly repeated untruths as if they were facts coupled with the self serving nature of a governing party that understands just how to tell an untruth in such a way as to cloud the intent, we have the recipe for communism.
For example, I recieved an e-mail from the D.N.C. website (again), run by the colorful Tom McMahon. This particular letter was in the name of Gov. Howard Dean III and began with the line:
"This could be George Bush's Watergate."
It was in reference to the eight recently fired U.S. Attorneys. You know, some of the attorneys that served at the pleasure of the president.
Now, this is a typical kind of beginning for a democrat to use whose aim is to demonstrate a problem that the people couldn't possibly cope with unaided. Since the democrats see themselves as the only party equipped to solve such things, then the people would find themselves with new policies imposed by big brother. (no the ad was not far from the mark, and Mr. Obama is, in my opinion, included in that group).
It does not matter to the dems that it was perfectly within the presidents powers to fire any and all of the U.S. Attorneys for any and all reasons including those political ones the dems are citing as inappropriate.
It only matters that the socialistic party spreading this sort of propagana can use it to incorrectly imply an improper use of power on the presidents part.
Repitition makes it true to the masses who are too busy to care enough for researching the facts, But This is no less a lie.
Further, I submit that this and many other acts by members of congress, especially those on the left, represent nothing short of sedition.
I also believe the legislative branch is again attempting to actively adjust policy in "real time", making laws in a continuously changing manner for the purpose of circumventing the executive role against the presidents will. I wonder if This could be cited in treason hearings as it is occurring against the president and the nation as a whole during a time of war involving cowardice in an overt effort to retreat in the face of the fact that casualties are on the order of 1/16th those of the vietnam conflict and easily 1/100th those of WWII, with a net effect of giving aid and comfort to the enemy, increasing friendly casualties and prolonging the conflict in the process.
However, with those uninitiated within the mass population of our country tending to absorb slogans and persistantly repeated untruths as if they were facts coupled with the self serving nature of a governing party that understands just how to tell an untruth in such a way as to cloud the intent, we have the recipe for communism.
For example, I recieved an e-mail from the D.N.C. website (again), run by the colorful Tom McMahon. This particular letter was in the name of Gov. Howard Dean III and began with the line:
"This could be George Bush's Watergate."
It was in reference to the eight recently fired U.S. Attorneys. You know, some of the attorneys that served at the pleasure of the president.
Now, this is a typical kind of beginning for a democrat to use whose aim is to demonstrate a problem that the people couldn't possibly cope with unaided. Since the democrats see themselves as the only party equipped to solve such things, then the people would find themselves with new policies imposed by big brother. (no the ad was not far from the mark, and Mr. Obama is, in my opinion, included in that group).
It does not matter to the dems that it was perfectly within the presidents powers to fire any and all of the U.S. Attorneys for any and all reasons including those political ones the dems are citing as inappropriate.
It only matters that the socialistic party spreading this sort of propagana can use it to incorrectly imply an improper use of power on the presidents part.
Repitition makes it true to the masses who are too busy to care enough for researching the facts, But This is no less a lie.
Further, I submit that this and many other acts by members of congress, especially those on the left, represent nothing short of sedition.
I also believe the legislative branch is again attempting to actively adjust policy in "real time", making laws in a continuously changing manner for the purpose of circumventing the executive role against the presidents will. I wonder if This could be cited in treason hearings as it is occurring against the president and the nation as a whole during a time of war involving cowardice in an overt effort to retreat in the face of the fact that casualties are on the order of 1/16th those of the vietnam conflict and easily 1/100th those of WWII, with a net effect of giving aid and comfort to the enemy, increasing friendly casualties and prolonging the conflict in the process.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)