Yah, You're No Ann Coulter

Dear Ann C. I read an article titled "Godless Meets Soulless in the Coulter Culture" by that fool Susan Estrich (or should that be Ostrich?) yeah cheap shot, I know. I feel she had it coming though. I also was compelled to let her understand the folly of her remarks. I did so thus:

Susan,

I don't see how you can say that one of America's most open and outspoken women is hiding behind a facade.
Ann may not be a beauty queen, but not for her looks as her smarts. If she just sat quietly, she could be a beauty queen.
Oh well, that's our Ann, beautiful AND smart! Perhaps it bugs you that she knows it? yeah, probably.
No one needs to defend what Ann says, but if you attack in slander fashion...
Does it frost you that only one conservative speaks out in the manner that most of the libs--ah, socialists do on a regular basis? I hope you gag on those words.
Harry Reid and the rest of the SS minnow have proven that dems are indeed gutless America haters, without the nuggets required to follow through on their boldly stated convictions. I call it cowardice.
She is right on almost all of the points you've raised, I mean, have you ever attended an Episcopal Mass? I have, I think Ann is onto something. It HAS been referred to as catholic lite.
Harsh? maybe. 1st amendment protected though. What care you, anyway? Trying to appear in defense of the church? Did you know it's not Islamic?
As to liberalism being the party of the opposition of God, well Cinderella, The shoe does fit. After all, this is what communism is! That spade is indeed a spade! Let's not forget ANY of the overt attacks on Christianity which came over the left wing walls, I won't!!
If you want to keep Ann Quiet, I suggest you go back to George Soros and pray to him for guidance as to what to do next. Don't think that goes unnoticed.
Have a nice day. sincerely, Vocal Patriot

Letter to the President

I thought of this when I was looking up voting records of congressmen.
april 27, 2007

Dear Mr. President, I was visiting the congress.org website feeling a
little ill at what I saw. A letter from a person in Hesperia, Ca. in
particular drew my Ire! he began it stating his assumption of your
arrogance then proceeded to make claims about how you view yourself as
if he could know. Perhaps only to demonstrate the definition of arrogance?
anyway, I had to counter that with my word of confidence in your
accomplishments to date. I appreciate, if only from my position, the
difficulty you face daily. I ask of you to hold fast to your
convictions and, as unpopular as they may seem, make your decisions based on your
conscience and your faith as you appear to have done since I've been
aware. I will support you openly, you and your family are in my prayers
daily. If you could find a way, I would be elated if you could seize
George Soros' assets and either detain him in guantanamo or deport him back
to hungary, Just an Idea. If not, ok, but we'll have to keep a sharp eye
on that one.
Oh, and if you've ever got a moment, look at my blog.
http://vocalpatriot.blogspot.com/ thank you.

The Gloves Are Off Now!!

So the house and senate Finally get around to passing the war funding bill. how long was it 80 days? You'd think they were passing a kidney stone. Funny thing, they passed a bill they know will not get past the President and that they haven't the votes to override. Sounds a lot like the "non-binding" resolution from not so long ago. I guess I shouldn't expect much. This congress needs dentures! The liberal faction can't seem to grasp some very simple concepts. For example: finish what you start, or how about: These extremist want us dead, as in really dead! You can't reason with them.
The puzzling part is that the dems don't get it that the first people that these radicals would shoot en-masse would be the liberals, the very people that would allow them to gain the power they seek. Well this is just not going down too well with me. I wrote my congressmen (or is it congresswimps) in case anyone is out there this is what I wrote...

Now you've done it! None of you are worth the skin that covers your sorry back sides.
Your seditious, socialist, disregard for the actual well being of the soldiers and indeed humanity in general needs to cost you your congressional seats. I feel that would be mild consequence. Jail time seems more fitting as I believe you've got sinister intent. Are you so bogged down in the semantics of policy that you just do not see what it is you are voting for? Advertisement of timetables are exactly what the enemy is hoping for. Even if it causes the iraqi government to scramble to get a grip on the situation, it will not succeed because the insurgents will simply wait for us to be gone and then they will take over. Do you really think iran will allow a democratic iraq stand so soon? Of course you do, you fools. You are an absolute embarrassment to this country, which I could bear if not for the fact that you're so dangerous. All of you dems are. Do you remember the term democrat means "people rule"? no matter to you, eh? George Soros is your god now, huh? I think you all should resign and take Ried and Pelosi with you. You cowards! Your mutinous actions of voting for the war and then taking all the steps necessary to hinder the execution of that order to the military is PROOF positive that you do not care whether our boys live or die over there. All for your own petty wants, your lying "party of the working class". For that there is NO EXCUSE! no forgiveness can in good conscience be afforded you. You have NOT made a friend in me. I will not allow you to turn this great country into your personal communist experiment. You wouldn't know civil rights if they bit you on the ankle. I will do everything legal and moral in my powers to have you removed from office you spineless jellyfish. You just may be the saddest excuse for a group of alleged "leaders" that may have ever existed. noone in their right mind would vote for a war then turn tail and run unless the intention was to lose in the first place. Is that what you dems are about? be honest, for once.

Kucinich, D-Ohio

Dennis Kucinich, democrat
I just found your website. I can't bear to view it for too long at any time. Due to the lies contained therein that are blatant and plain. Do you really in your heart of hearts think that al-qaeda will disolve if we retreat as we did in Vietnam? Do you think this will just blow over the way it did then? Do you think the dems (A.K.A. socialists) will rule for long if they succeed in doing the tuck-tail run and usurp the executive powers for the liberals in the legislative branch to wield? Your reach for communism will not be recieved well. Are you so foolish as to think that the muslim extremists wouldn't cut your head off on camera if they had the chance? I call for your resignation! You may include those of your comrades as well. Articles of impeachment need to be introduced, I feel you are a traitor and your acts of sedition should be punished to the fullest extent of the law. Sedition, willful division of the government for the purpose securing control over that government. All this in a time of war. You should at least have the decency to hang your head in shame! Ah, but that's too much to ask, isn't it?

Proper Process, Presidents Decision, Get it Right!

In response to an article I read which was written by Susan Estrich:

The worst thing about the Gonzales witch hunt, is that it is indirectly George Soros who is grilling the man for a crime that was not committed. Remember the president's got the power to fire them?
So then, having done so a scandal is created? Ludicrous is the word that comes to mind.
Was he really "happy to admit" something? Funny I didn't get that from any of this.
"A totally flawed and misguided process"? By who's assesment? It was up to the president, he gave the word, no need for explanations. Of course he'd do it again...it was his job.
I love this, "unlike the other appointees, serving the president was not his only job." what? they had no other jobs? What were they appointed for? They weren't there simply to be whipping boys for the president. They apparently did not accomplish what the president needed done. I'd fire them too. You said "loyalty means staying with your team, even if your leader is wrong" I most heartily and totally disagree and feel strongly that this is a lie on your part. But staying even when your leader is percieved to be wrong is certainly noble. However you, no doubt unwittingly,do make a strong point regarding personal responsiblity. It is incumbant upon each of us to make ourselves aware of the facts and to act according to our own conscience. Could it be that which the left is accusing Gonzales? yeah, probably. Oh, the essence of politics is to create and enforce policy for the good of the nation, did you forget that too? C'mon Sue, just admit it to yourself, you are buying into the liberal mindset that all things conservative must go! Be honest, you know conservatives don't really think that way. You must understand that Gonzales is middle managment and as such should the boss say "fire that new guy" it gets done without further cause. Perfectly legitimate. So having once again exposed that which is blatantly obvious, it's strongly evident that this "seeking and deliberate harrassment" is simply designed to usurp executive powers for the legislative left to wield. Don't forget the danger of enabling this kind of political treachery. This is the same process used by totalitarians across the globe from time immemorial.
The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.
All this while George Soros sits behind stage, denying complicity. He controls the value of the dollar, the british pound, the euro, the ruble. His express extremist liberal views are coming to fruition.
He's not american born and his are malicious intents. What would that make him?
Listen to him, watch him, record his denials. Yet the world economy hangs on his spoken words.
You want a happy fluffy world? He will sell you one...you get what you pay for.

But remember, All Sales are Final.

Infallible Sigh-ence

Are the proclamations made by scientists regarding historical evidence valid, accurate accounts of the past? Or are they bad science, using assumptions without weight given to all the empirical evidence relating to facts surrounding the given study which may refute the ultimate aim of that study?
In other words, are scientists only finding the facts they want or are they being truly objective?
Case in point; on a recent fact search I found a website which listed, amongst other things, a short group of "fact" points designed to demonstrate "how we know about past climate."
The first point said:
> "the geological record of carved mountain valleys, scratched bedrock, glacial debris and moraines gives evidence of the past several million years."
I thought this fairly accurate citing the claim that this was merely evidence rather than proven fact. (egos notwithstanding)
Point two:
>Recently, cores have been removed from the ice at Vostok station in antarctica. The longest cores about 2000 meters, sampling layers of ice deposited as early as 160,000 years ago. The ice trapped bubbles of air when it froze.
The ratio of oxygen isotopes in this air indicates the average air temperature at the time the bubble was trapped in the ice. The bubbles also trap atmospheric greenhouse gases that can be measured.
OK! Well, first, not to bash those with degrees too harshly:
I'll assume the core sample librarians have taken into account the Idea that some of those layers may have been made liquid and refrozen over the past 1600 centuries. But did they remember that even frozen ice is still fluid? The importance of that tidbit of knowledge becomes evident over the time span indicated because air bubbles, being much less dense than the ice will continually exert upward pressure and some gases may escape the bonds easier than others. Has this been fully explored?
The Idea that Ice works better than tupperware over the span of thousands of years is, frankly, hard to swallow.
So, the leap from air bubble content to average air temp seems less sure.
By the way, to help with the average air temp question..at the time the air bubbles became trapped, the air temperature was probably at or below 32°F. Just let me say, I didn't need the ratio of oxygen isotopes to arrive at that conclusion.
The point here of course, is that we can't say we "know" so readily. we need to adhere more closely to the scientific method. This has been a thorn in the side of the scientific community for as far back as we care to look.
In defense of the folks that assembled that webpage, there were many more points that all stated the case eloquently and the page as a whole was based in fact.
My point was to demonstrate how easily the facts can be manipulated with a few poorly stated claims.
Now we need to take another look at Al Gores entertainment endeavour in which the real truth was clearly too inconvenient for his cause.
Perhaps there exists a theory as to what his cause could be if not his genuine concern for gods green earth. Judging by his personal consumption tendency concern is not one of Al's strengths.

The Senator doesn't get it!

In response to the inane chatter in a letter from the junior senator from massachusetts to me regarding the Iraq war:
Mr. Kerry, Apparently you didn't read my letter. I'm not surprised. You haven't been listening too closely to your constituents either. It's ok though, I understand fully. You are not up to the task you've been required to perform. Sound similar to your military record?
First off, the views I have are shared by just about everyone I have talked to on the subject. To me that is evidence that not only are you not listening, but that you are actively ignoring the people. I know you made lots of money by marrying two rich widows, real manly of you, but that money alone does not give you carte blanc to legislate your own views or those of the few rich contributors you've dug from the island muck. That would be an oligarchy. It represents a betrayal of trust it's irresponsible and morally wrong.
As to the "escalation" I agree with one small point. Escalation by itself will simply be a bigger nothing. As was implied in my previous letter we need to throw all we have into this at once! In the manner of Golda Mier. Let me help you here..we need to produce squads to hunt and kill our enemies. 20,000 troops is more than enough to flood the area to watch, film, catalogue targets, track and hunt. This done in large numbers will not take long, will be effective in reducing the violence in the cities so the iraqi government can carry on.
The bulk of the military can continue guarding and building relations with the people.
The enemy would get the picture.
President Reagan had no problem with the concept of peace through strength, why do you? Or is it that you really don't give a damn about our sons and daughters over there?
The idea is basically to win this thing BEFORE we bring the troops home, just a matter of priority. Hoping to have a dialogue with a government that feels they were abandoned and a horde of idealogues bent on the destruction of all things american(even if you share that definition), this in an atmosphere of impending anarchy caused by the major violent coup that would transcend on that country like smallpox did in europe is irational and frankly insane. I say insane because we've done this before in vietnam. Why should we expect a different result this time?
Don't forget, Sir, that these people have not been able to take charge of their country for over thirty years(except for the privaliged few) and untill they get it we need to be present. This is not only a matter of kindness for the iraqis but of vital import to the precedents we set in the world. We have not done a good job defending our own soveriegnty and so all the marxist, socialist and other totalitarian influences in the world are getting bold. Do you wish to bend prostrate facing east to save your own skin? Don't laugh, you know as well as I do this is the aim of these extremists. This is how they have propagated their agenda to date. There is no reason to believe they will change their methods noweven if you pretend to agree with them. We both know that compliance would be high on your agenda should these extremists gain control of this country. The sad part about that is the fact that all those brave soldiers currently abroad are risking life and limb to defend your right to speak this cowardly trash you do while you vote to limit their ability to do just that. That is Neville Chamberlain style insanity.
Your spineless, selfserving, socialist agenda is not welcome and sure to bring the same kind of unrest found around the world to our homes. Because of this I pledge to do all I can legally and morally do to have you and others like you replaced by men and women of strong character and core values that reflect the american way.

Letter sent to Sen. kennedy, Sen. Kerry, Rep. Delahunt

Dear Sirs, If you truly have concerns regarding the welfare of our sons and daughters in combat abroad, (I have my doubts that you do) then to push all we have against this to end it now is the answer. By that I mean that we need to fight with every ounce of our collective being. This strategy of political division in which you are engaging is irresponsible and quite frankly seditious. We can not afford to turn and retreat as we did in Vietnam nor to fight this war in this divided state. The urgency of my intent cannot satisfactorily be expressed with written words here, so respectfully I must add that If we do not turn congress around on this issue, I will campaign to have you all removed from the valued offices you occupy by any legal and moral means available to me. You do not truly represent the state nor its inhabitants if you continue to use this and other vital concerns of the people to further your own careers which some would claim is a criminal act. Although it may be tough to carry a charge of treason, I feel this charge would be justified. Due to the fact that your antics in congress of financial addons, overt attacks on the republican party and endless, pointless investigations aimed at usurping executive powers have prolonged this conflict you have thus endangered countless lives. Those of our military and those of innocents abroad. This is not the conduct of the progenitors of humanitarianism. This is the conduct of greedy elitists vying for socialist governance. We need better than this. I for one, believe that you think you know better than the people. That arrogance, may be the downfall of the democrat party. Since a one party system won't work either, my suggestion would be to act cautiously and with restraint. Further, It is not the place of congress to conduct the tasks so ordered by congress indeed as overwhelmingly as you have. To this I say; MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS AND LET THE PRESIDENT MIND HIS!!!

facetious-oscopy

Yet another DNC letter, this one asking me to write back with reasons to bring home the troops from Iraq for a new lie ad. I so obliged:

Our men and women in uniform are being slaughtered at an unbelieable rate!
PLEASE!! Listen to me!!! Bring them home now. Get all of our helicopters over there and evacuate them the way we retreated in Vietnam. What were we thinking by sending our woefully trained troops over to that burning hell of a country inhabited by giant tunneling superbeings with unbeatable weapons! Our babies in the sand should never have been allowed to go that far from home.
Oh, I beseech you, great leaders we need them here to be gas station attendants due to to the fact that the wonderful model of a world leader (as Barbara walters implies) Hugo Chavez is so magnanimously offering his salvation of home heating oil to the huddled masses beneath your feet.
No consideration need be given to the hordes of radical Islamists anyway because the world will be burned to a crisp by Al Gores global warming all too soon..I would think we need to have them home to pass away in peace with us.
We are a defeated people and we should be spending time finding ways to look fashionable with our tails tucked between our legs.