Saturday, June 30, 2007

What's Happening?

WWII 1942-1945-----------------Iraq War 2003-2007
407,316 lost to war--------------3,578 lost to war
2,165 lost to abortion-----------1,747,880 lost to abortion
more lost to combat-------------more lost to abortions
per week than--------------------than all major wars
total abortions-------------------ever fought.
during the whole war-----------By the U.S.


Priority, I think, is a missing element in the thought process of many who support abortion using “pro-choice” as their argument.
None consider the choice of the baby on death row. Arguments of when the life of a “fetus” begins ring hollow when one admits that viable life begins at conception. In 1973 the laws were changed allowing choice based on a perceived need for health and safety of the potential mother. Strangely enough, the most common reason offered by those same women are social in nature. Many of those women become repeat clients, so what of safety and good health? of course it is simply a way to give the masses the wonderful opiate of uninhibited sex, but who'd say that out loud?
Just the use of the Latin word “fetus” is an attempt to distance any emotional ties from the act. The word translates affectionately to “little one”, so much for distance.

So back to my to my question, What’s Happening?

Why did the so called “liberal left” push this deadly agenda? Why do the practitioners of this sanctioned infanticide kickback to the politicians for their support?
As any hedonist can attest, it certainly makes a neat form of birth control.
To many, killing a person is apparently less distasteful than abstinence.
Do the millions of abortion clients and practitioners represent the moral majority of this country? I hope not. Apparently they do, however represent a large part of the democrat voting base which does not, in my opinion absolve the legislative body from doing what’s right.
Hmm..there’s a thought.

Perhaps one could make the case that it would be so much cheaper not to engage in war at all, save on ammunition, armor, fuel, etc. I mean, just imagine how peaceful this world would be if we'd Just get them before they were born rather than waiting until they could fight back. Well maybe not, even Marx realized that you can't move too fast when advocating socialist dogma for fear of pushing the people to revolt. You have to sneak any changes into the collective conciousness in the manner described in George Orwells "Animal Farm".
So, can righteousness in a minority prevail? I think that’s a good question to put to Senator John Kerry. He's had 35 years to think about it, But I'm afraid I already know his answer. Ah well, Gods will is going to prevail afterall.

No comments: