The Senator doesn't get it!

In response to the inane chatter in a letter from the junior senator from massachusetts to me regarding the Iraq war:
Mr. Kerry, Apparently you didn't read my letter. I'm not surprised. You haven't been listening too closely to your constituents either. It's ok though, I understand fully. You are not up to the task you've been required to perform. Sound similar to your military record?
First off, the views I have are shared by just about everyone I have talked to on the subject. To me that is evidence that not only are you not listening, but that you are actively ignoring the people. I know you made lots of money by marrying two rich widows, real manly of you, but that money alone does not give you carte blanc to legislate your own views or those of the few rich contributors you've dug from the island muck. That would be an oligarchy. It represents a betrayal of trust it's irresponsible and morally wrong.
As to the "escalation" I agree with one small point. Escalation by itself will simply be a bigger nothing. As was implied in my previous letter we need to throw all we have into this at once! In the manner of Golda Mier. Let me help you here..we need to produce squads to hunt and kill our enemies. 20,000 troops is more than enough to flood the area to watch, film, catalogue targets, track and hunt. This done in large numbers will not take long, will be effective in reducing the violence in the cities so the iraqi government can carry on.
The bulk of the military can continue guarding and building relations with the people.
The enemy would get the picture.
President Reagan had no problem with the concept of peace through strength, why do you? Or is it that you really don't give a damn about our sons and daughters over there?
The idea is basically to win this thing BEFORE we bring the troops home, just a matter of priority. Hoping to have a dialogue with a government that feels they were abandoned and a horde of idealogues bent on the destruction of all things american(even if you share that definition), this in an atmosphere of impending anarchy caused by the major violent coup that would transcend on that country like smallpox did in europe is irational and frankly insane. I say insane because we've done this before in vietnam. Why should we expect a different result this time?
Don't forget, Sir, that these people have not been able to take charge of their country for over thirty years(except for the privaliged few) and untill they get it we need to be present. This is not only a matter of kindness for the iraqis but of vital import to the precedents we set in the world. We have not done a good job defending our own soveriegnty and so all the marxist, socialist and other totalitarian influences in the world are getting bold. Do you wish to bend prostrate facing east to save your own skin? Don't laugh, you know as well as I do this is the aim of these extremists. This is how they have propagated their agenda to date. There is no reason to believe they will change their methods noweven if you pretend to agree with them. We both know that compliance would be high on your agenda should these extremists gain control of this country. The sad part about that is the fact that all those brave soldiers currently abroad are risking life and limb to defend your right to speak this cowardly trash you do while you vote to limit their ability to do just that. That is Neville Chamberlain style insanity.
Your spineless, selfserving, socialist agenda is not welcome and sure to bring the same kind of unrest found around the world to our homes. Because of this I pledge to do all I can legally and morally do to have you and others like you replaced by men and women of strong character and core values that reflect the american way.